Re: RE: FLASH: browser sensing

[Bob Schwartz]

got it.  


why not "less dangerous", providing, as you suggest, that the wording is

"proper"?


thanks.


bob


At 01:21 PM 2/10/99 -0500, you wrote:

>

flashershocker [dot] com,Internet writes:

>>Hi,

>

>>How about just a small flash move and a button saying "if you didn't see

this,

>>then do this........"?

>

>>is that less dangerous than a "meta refresh"?

>not really less dangerous, but just as valid i think. there's really no harm

in

>having a front page that gives the user 2 choices. the only issue is how the

>choices are worded, which will be different from site to site depending on how

>savvy the audience is.

>

>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an

>

email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com

>N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.

>

For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com

>



------------------------------------------------------------------------

To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an

email to

list-managershocker [dot] com

.  Problems to:

ownershocker [dot] com

N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.

For info on digest mode send: info flasher to

list-managershocker [dot] com