Re: RE: FLASH: browser sensing

[Bob Schwartz]

hmmm.  makes sense......OK.  thanks.


bob


At 02:18 PM 2/10/99 -0500, you wrote:

>

flashershocker [dot] com,Internet writes:

>>why not "less dangerous", providing, as you suggest, that the wording is

>>"proper"?

>because if i were using the meta approach, the meta would take the user to the

>non-flash version of the site, and on the non-flash version there would be a

>link to the flash version. i don't consider that dangerous because the user

>still gets decent content, and always has the option to manually visit the

>flash version.

>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an

>

email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com

>N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.

>

For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com

>



------------------------------------------------------------------------

To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an

email to

list-managershocker [dot] com

.  Problems to:

ownershocker [dot] com

N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.

For info on digest mode send: info flasher to

list-managershocker [dot] com