Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH: Shockwave VS Flash??
From: RedStar
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 23:45:01 GMT

Alejandro's question has the merit of showing how Macromedia still
hasn't managed to educate us shockwave producers ;).
I think Michael's reply is the one that got closer to the mark.
Some time ago back in June of 95 I think Macromedia and Netscape
announced they would combine technologies so as to bring 'True
Multimedia to the Internet'. From this date onward 'shockwave' started
slowly entering into circulation.
By 1996 terms like 'shockwave for director' 'shockwave for freehand' and
'shockwave for authorware' were being used quite freely.
By Jan 1997 when Macromedia announces Flash it comes a no surprise that
it's heralded as the newest addition to the Shockwave family.
By the way Macromedia didn't buy FutureSplash. Macromedia bought
FutureWare Software the company that developed FutureSplash Animator.
At the time Bud Colligan, Macromedia chairman, said "Macromedia Flash
addresses the growing needs of web page designers who want to easily
create Shockwave animations and graphics that are small, fast and fun."

OK I'll end the history lesson for now.

.redstar.

flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and The Flash Film Festival
"The Worlds Premier Flash Solutions Conference and Expo"
March 27-29, Nob Hill Masonic Center, San Francisco, California

-Register before Feb 25 and save $200!!-- www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpatchinwag [dot] com


Replies
  FLASH: Shockwave VS Flash??, Alejandro Sanchez

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]