Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH: FLASH 99% BAD
From: Dana
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:55:59 GMT

> It is more flexible than HTML and if people are to stupid not to realise
they are viewing Flash and that the browser buttons do not
> work the way they do it HTML I do not think I want them on my site.

I guess it depends on your target audience, but not everyone is an internet
junkie/web designer/developer or even computer savvy. Most people who just
use the web for information and sending email would have NO IDEA about the
difference between Flash and static html, let alone the way their browser
buttons will treat the different formats.

Just my 2 cents.

Dana
http://mojico.org


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and the Flash(tm) Film Festival
November 27-29, 2000, LONDON, National Film Theatre

Produced by United Digital Artists and lynda.com
-Sponsored by Macromedia, Adobe Systems and Apple Computer
-http://www.flashforward2000.com or UK tel. +44 (0870) 751 1526
Register before November 10 and save 200
http:// www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpatchinwag [dot] com


Replies
  RE: FLASH: FLASH 99% BAD, Chris Basken
  Re: FLASH: FLASH 99% BAD, Thorvald Neumann

Replies
  Re: FLASH: FLASH 99% BAD, Andrew Le Sage
  Re: FLASH: FLASH 99% BAD, Thorvald Neumann

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]