[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: Re: 324 tax on digital TV?
From: Tim Ireland
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 20:26:21 +0100


----- Original Message -----
From: John Braithwaite <JohnBatGBGdirect [dot] com>
To: <uk-netmarketingatmail [dot] chinwag [dot] com>
Sent: 11 August 1999 17:25
Subject: UKNM: RE: UKNM Digest V1 #242


> BBC - ok - stop the licence fee, get the adverts in (and sponsorship)
> and watch it churn millions. After all, some of the ex-public
> institutions that we have set out on the commercial paths are now our
> trailblazers abroad (BT, British Gas, Electrics firms, Water firms
> etc.). It has to be either the licence fee or adverts.
> Personally I would prefer to pay 300 p.a. and get no adverts or
> interruptions on any channels - but that's just me!

Adverts *between* programs have been introduced by the ABC (BBC's little
brother in OZ, which costs taxpayers 12c a day)
********************
UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.
Email Khalil Ibrahimi khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com) to advertise on Excite.
********************
Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html



Replies
  UKNM: RE: UKNM Digest V1 #242, John Braithwaite

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]