[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: RE: UKNM: Top 100 UK New Media Agencies
From: Dee Edwards
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:52:36 +0100


Another thing to bear in mind when 'judging' agencies on turnover is how
much of that is 'pass through'. For example, some agencies do a lot of
online media buying on behalf of their clients, so have large sums going
through their books on media spend. This could distort figures.

Dee


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owneratchinwag [dot] com [owneratchinwag [dot] com]On">mailto:owneratchinwag [dot] com]On Behalf Of Sarah
> Clelland
> Sent: 25 August 2000 10:38
> To: uknmatchinwag [dot] com
> Subject: RE: UKNM: Top 100 UK New Media Agencies
>
>
> I agree Stewart, but it seems to me that most of these lists
> are based on
> turnover, one of the reasons being that this actually protects egos.
>
> Marketing magazine ran their Design League Tables recently, and their
> Internet Design Agency list was completely bizarre. Based on
> Turnover, it
> actually offered two sets of figures - Turnover
> and...Internet Turnover(?).
> AKQA came first with 21,000,000 in both columns, but CLK.MPL who came
> 50th recorded their Internet turnover at a mere 448,370.

[Sam says: msg chopped]


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ScreamingMedia the leading global technology platform for
the aggregation and distribution of digital content over the
Internet, is now operating in the United Kingdom.
Get relevant and customised content to attract visitors
to your site and keep them there. Click Here!

http://adcenter.in2.com/cgi-bin/click.cgi?tid=31036
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]