[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]

Subject: Re: UKNM: Word.com
From: Lee.Rickler
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:58:37 GMT

Same here BUT this raises the question "but is it right"?

The general user, (freeserver), would look at word.com and either:
1, Think it is Yahoo and attempt a search, (D'OH!)
2, Think it is rubbish because it doesn't go woooosh BANG!!


those in the trade would either:
1, Applaud it for it's truthfulness and arrogance.
2, Slag it off because it aint new or their idea.

I would say it's a cross between

Freeserver - 1
Trade - 2


Chris Heathcote
<chris@head-new To: uk-netmarketingatchinwag [dot] com
media.com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: UKNM: Word.com

At 6:06 pm +0000 on 26/1/00, Stefan Magdalinski wrote:
>::rapturous applause::
>gold dust: a designer who gets it.
>although you can have a site that works that doesn't *look* exactly like

and look at it now ;)

I must say, though, I do agree with a moderate amount of what he says
in his new letter.

Chris Heathcote <Head> New Media
http://www.head-newmedia.com/ tel: +44(0)1717377579

http://www.head-space.org/ fax: +44(0)1717377971

post new media vacancies for free uknm-jobsatchinwag [dot] com
sponsor the uk-netmarketing list and website, contact
salesatchinwag [dot] com for more details.
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]