uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | RE: [uk-netmarketing] RE: The Rules |
From: | Dan Winchester |
Date: | Sat, 27 Jan 2001 17:22:28 -0000 |
> All this criticism could be (and is!) equally levelled
> at other technologies
That doesn't make it (the criticism) wrong!
> Any system which relies upon an application server
> and built-on-the-fly pages will not be indexable,
> spiderable, emailable
It doesn't have to be that way. Very-frequently-updated dynamic content is a
different issue from unique addressability, which as you mention, maybe
warrants a seperate debate.
> Contrast that with a frames site where content is
> referenced by a "cgi" address, which may well be unique.
Every problem with frames can be solved with one fudge or another if you
really wanted to go down that road...
> application server
I'm not sure exactly what that is.
Incidently, I've heard rumours of one *big* company rolling out one of the
content management systems, and giving up half way through, specifically
because it couldn't cope with the basics:
> * spidered
> * emailed
> * linked to
> * referenced
> * logged
Anyone else heard any similar stories?
Cheers
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Silas Denyer [silas [dot] denyerturns [dot] net (mailto:silas [dot] denyerturns [dot] net)]
Sent: 26 January 2001 22:02
To: uk-netmarketing from chinwag
Subject: [uk-netmarketing] RE: The Rules
[Sam says: msg chopped]
Replies
Re: [uk-netmarketing] RE: The Rules, Silas Denyer
Replies
Re: [uk-netmarketing] RE: The Rules, Silas Denyer
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]