[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: RE: UKNM: Bad search engines
From: Ian Fenn
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 18:30:17 +0100

At 12:19 31/07/00 +0100, Jude wrote:
>What makes the keyword system so different from the user perspective, is
>that they only get high quality results- no rubbish- no dead links -no
links
>leading to britney spears nude mpegs ('less thats what your after). What
the
>user gets is quality.

If only that were true. My own experience of goto.com is that companies
with big bucks are being awarded search terms that they can offer only one
page of content against. They are also being allowed to have the click-thru
lead the visitor to their home page rather than to the correct and relevant
destination.

Cash-poor niche sites (like mine) end up further down in the results,
despite arguably offering more detailed and relevant content.

It therefore doesn't follow that visitors gets high quality results from
this system.

Money talks, as always.

--
Ian Fenn
http://www.chopstix.net/ - The award-winning Oriental food and culture site.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ScreamingMedia the leading global technology platform for
the aggregation and distribution of digital content over the
Internet, is now operating in the United Kingdom.
Get relevant and customised content to attract visitors
to your site and keep them there. Click Here!

http://adcenter.in2.com/cgi-bin/click.cgi?tid=31036
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  Re: UKNM: Bad search engines, Sam Carrington
  RE: UKNM: Bad search engines, Jude Beggs

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]