Re: UKNM: More webwashing

[jim smith]

At 4:37 pm +0100 on 18/5/99 Ray said:

>

jim smith <jimflenser [dot] co [dot] uk> said:

>

>>>>i think, however, you are missing the point of the argument

>(understandably, given your position). no-one is arguing for less marketing

>on the web (except for stef). the point about ad banners is that they are a

>dead-end solution: they have failed to mesh with their medium in the way

>that your other examples have succeeded to do.<<<

>

>"Mesh with their medium." I can't say you're wrong, Jim, because you are

>talking netty gobbledegook.


i thought i was talking media-studies/marketing bullshit. it gets quite

muffled up my arse so i must have misheard.



>But equally there are plenty of print, broadcast and ambient campaigns



ambient campaigns? to continue your ad hominem:


>Speak English, man!


--//--------------------------------------------------------------------

jim smith -

jimflenser [dot] co [dot] uk

  -  http://www.flenser.co.uk  0961 319040

everything has been said, provided words do not change their meanings or

meanings their words                                         -- alpha 60 

********************

UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.

Email Khalil Ibrahimi

khalilexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilexcitecorp [dot] com)

 to advertise on Excite.

********************

Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html