[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: UKNM: Re: Re: UKNM Digest V1 #763
From: Tim Ireland
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 18:28:58 GMT

"Tom" <tomattui [dot] co [dot] uk> spoke in response to Ray thusly:
> >That's my point! That degree of creativity for TV ads is mega-expensive.
> >You could produce a small feature film cheaper. To do Flat Eric or Bud on
> >web only would be a fraction of the cost, with a much bigger audience
than
> >any TV network anywhere in the world would provide.
> >
> >Ray Taylor
>
> Er.....why would the "creativity" and production costs be cheaper if a TV
ad
> was on the web? You are confusing means of production with mode of
> distribution.

I think what Ray is saying is that Web broadcasts are at a lower resolution
than TV - so you can film it with a digital camera and post production can
be done on a desktop, not in a studio @ £1K an hour plus all the cocaine you
can carry.

He is discussing the possibility of ads on a TV *style* being made
specifically for the web.

Your point on creativity is taken though. Bloody great ideas don't come
cheap unless they're yours.

Tim Ireland
Director of Marketing
www.designercity.com


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Spending too long reading these emails and not enough time working?
Could be time for a new job. For all the best jobs in IT, New media,
and E-Commerce, come to RevolutionVisit
at London Olympia 2 24/25 November.

See http://www.revolutionvisit.com/1 to find out more.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]