Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH: flash for banners or not?
From: John Dowdell
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 01:16:11 +0100

At 1:42 PM 3/30/0, Sarah Lamont wrote:
> Are advertising web banners being made with flash primarily or
> not? I was under the impression that they were, but my boss
> told me that they should be animated gifs. Is this true?

The majority of banners are GIFs, true, but rich-media ads tend to get
better results, and have the better growth rate.

Last week's ICONOCAST quoted Jupiter Communications as saying that 60% of
all online advertising will be rich-media by 20002. Among rich-media ads
today, Jupiter quotes Flash as the leading technique, with 54% of
rich-media ads using it. Enliven and RealAudio follow at 27% apiece.

You can read their summary in the March 23 issue:
http://www.iconocast.com/

jd









flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and The Flash Film Festival
"The Worlds Premier Flash Solutions Conference and Expo"
March 27-29, Nob Hill Masonic Center, San Francisco, California

-Register before Feb 25 and save $200!!-- www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpatchinwag [dot] com


Replies
  Re: FLASH: flash for banners or not?, Sarah Lamont
  Re: FLASH: flash for banners or not?, John Olson

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]