Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: RE: FLASH: Macromedia Flash Deployment Kit
From: Troy Evans
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:16:50 +0100

I agree.

The FLash deployment kit should be a living breathing envirnoment as the Web changes constantly every 3 months, so it needs to
update. My thoughts exactly.

Regards
Troy Evans
Flash Player Prodcut Marketing Manager

-----Original Message-----
From: owneratchinwag [dot] com [owneratchinwag [dot] com]On">mailto:owneratchinwag [dot] com]On Behalf Of JGL
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 9:14 PM
To: flasheratchinwag [dot] com
Subject: RE: FLASH: Macromedia Flash Deployment Kit


Hmmmm.....I hope it is what it wants to be! Atleast there is a living
breathing awareness from the mothership in regards to these concerns . . . .
right?
My feeling is that MM has the resources to put something like this together
properly, and I am sure they will. Late April/Early May - Damn, why do
corporate things take so long?
My feeling also is that we out here in the fields are just as keen to
potential problems and hazards that may otherwise be inadvertantly
overlooked by the great MM.
The efforts at the compatibility list will continue to keep a focus, not to
nag, but to be sure that our sites are viewable across the board. A QA sort
of. And I bet we'll notice these efforts get considered in this new release.
With the web the way it is, we know it's pain in the unowut to cross
platform ANYTHING these days. And I would be very surprised to hear MM claim
that this is an endall/fixall. That could never be. MS and AOL are dictating
the rules for many viewers and in some cases they are heading in opposite
directions.
An Ideal Flash Deployment Kit is a living, breathing, evolving, updated,
keen to new problems, fast acting, get down to business, no bs, answer the
needs of developers, viewers, johnny on the spot.
know what I mean?
Late April/Early May - why does it have to be a kit? Why can't these
resources be divulged as they are developed? Just asking - trying not to nag
. . .
I would feel much more confident about this if it was named something like:

<Flash Deployment Alert and Resource Center>

Not a downloaded kit. More of a Web portal with a really cool control panel
and graphs with lots of red and green lights run by highly paid scientists
with full-time assistants headed by Dr. Barranger Ridly to monitor the net -
and with spies flying helicopters over MS and AOLN finding out what's coming
around the corner so they can immediately alert the developers with fixes
and patches to make it all better again. Of course I'm kinda kidding, but
that is the kind of confidence I would like.
A kit?
This is really to be viewed as constructive - I applaud MM spending
resources on this.

jgl



flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get the last 100 messages from the flasher list NOW
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/last100.shtml

Flash books http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/books.shtml
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpatchinwag [dot] com


flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get the last 100 messages from the flasher list NOW
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/last100.shtml

Flash books http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/books.shtml
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpatchinwag [dot] com


Replies
  RE: FLASH: Macromedia Flash Deployment K, JGL

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]