Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: FLASH: Delivery Error Notification.
From: Mailer-Daemon
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:33:44 +0100

You sent a message which could not be delivered.

The error message is:
Too many retries

Here are the first 20 lines of the original message you sent.
-------------------------------------------------------------
SMF-70
To: rlr39728atbatman [dot] tamucc [dot] edu
From: MBBS@BBS {MBBS: INT:flasheratshocker [dot] com}
Subject: Re: FLASH: Site structure in flash

Received: from mail.chinwag.com [194.130.107.95] by home1.mavrick-bbs.com with smtp
id BADDBDAP ; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 16:51:18 -0500
Received: (from majordomo.daemon@localhost)
by mail.chinwag.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
id WAA11269 for flasher-outgoing; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 22:08:16 +0100
Received: from naples.netwide.net (naples.netwide.net [209.26.140.4])
by mail.chinwag.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
id WAA11266 for <flasheratshocker [dot] com>; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 22:08:15 +0100
Received: from netwide.net ([209.26.141.54]) by naples.netwide.net
(Post.Office MTA v3.5 release 215 ID# 0-52390U2500L250S0V35)
with ESMTP id net for <flasheratshocker [dot] com>;
Wed, 26 Aug 1998 17:07:19 -0400
Message-ID: <35E47AD0 [dot] A7BD34AEatnetwide [dot] net>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 17:14:56 -0400
From: dgarystudiosatnetwide [dot] net (David Gary)
Organization: D. Gary Studios
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I)
To: flasheratshocker [dot] com
Subject: Re: FLASH: Site structure in flash
References: <81831E1053A2D111A03800805FEFA27D866ABCatexchange1 [dot] telescan [dot] com>
Sender: owneratshocker [dot] com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flasheratshocker [dot] com



> > And those sites would be?
> > You also said "Any Flash designer can upgrade to the Generator
> > Developers
> > Studio at low cost" ($199.00 from macromedia's web site. This is for
> > the
> > upgrade, if you don't have the prior generator, which I am sure many
> > don't
> > have.It will be $499.00 Which is more than Flash itself!)"
> >

Hiya Jester,

If you are charging even the minimal base price for your Flash work, Im sure
the
ISP's small increase in revenue wont make that big of a difference. The
bottom line is,
if the client wants "on the spot updates" you provide them with a
"generated" server.
Its simple, simply bill the client for that "optional" service. Business
that can afford "state of the art" wouldnt be pinched in the slightest will
those prices. If your getting payed to update the "generated" site the
client should be paying the subscription fee for the ISP and most
developers charge double or more just to process it.

Thats how technology and the economy work. To stay on the "cutting edge"
takes
money and more than usual. The company or person paying for your services
should pay if they want the latest technology, not you. So whats the big
deal?
If its not a standard, its an option. Ever buy a new car, know what you pay


-------------------------------------------------------------
* Automated Notice Sent by MajorTCP/IP on home1.mavrick-bbs.com*



------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com

Replies
  Re: FLASH: Delivery Error Notification., Vivi Isandy

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]