Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH: IPIX vrs . . QT . . . with Flash . . .
From: Daniel Votino
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 04:23:52 GMT

Since someone here knows the answer perhaps I can ask for a clarification.
So then, which is the VRLX Flashed site using, IPIX or QT?
Do they both require plugins?
Wich is the most cost effective . . .
Anyone have a comparison to run and how it might relate to future Flashing?

Thank

~Daniel



>
>I am the Walrus wrote:
>
>> > When you say FULL 360 do you mean like in "spherical" mapping? QT
>> > gives you 360.
>>
>> IPIX gives you a spherical view.
>>
>> You mean straight up and down, where as QT gives you an illusion of
looking
>> about 10 degree skyward?
>>
>> even a monkey could learn how to use their software.
>
>Im in!
>
>
>> Don't you mean dis-advantage? And YES the $25 fee is a pain,
>
>Lil' pun intended, but 25bucks doesnt seem bad if clients are buying it
over QT.
>
>thks,
>
>-DG-
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
>email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
>N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
>For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com


------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]