Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH: Alcazar, revisited. Specific info.
From: Russell E. Unger
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 09:44:43 +0100

>
>Erm.. that waz my exact comment bud - just think that my mail did not reach
>ya though ...
>
>I said that I actually joined this list to help and be helped .... not to
>get shot down by siteless peeps...!
>
>AND I DID NOT FOR ONE SECOND SAY THAT I AM BETTER THAN GABO KAPISH!!!


Am I the only person mis-reading your arrogant, self-serving posts, then?
Am I? Capiche?

>PHUCK BUD _ LEARN TO READ b4 YOU MAKE SUCH ACCUSATIONS - I LOVE GABO's WORK
>AND RESPECT IT!!!


Respect, to me, would mean that you would be able to refrain from masking
your vulgarity...as someone once said, "Vulgarity is reserved for those not
intelligent enough to find the appropriate words to take its place."

Yet again, 'nuff said.


Russ

>ta ta Russ!!!
>
>Kind Regards
>DJT - Pieter
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Russell E. Unger [rungeratzaxcoms [dot] com (mailto:rungeratzaxcoms [dot] com)]
>Sent: 27 May 1999 05:37
>To: flasheratshocker [dot] com
>Subject: FLASH: Alcazar, revisited. Specific info.
>
>
>There was a crack about the site only utilizing "600k of bandwidth".
>
>In case you don't know who Forrester is, they're one of, if not the
>largest firms that research and collect tons of information in "our"
>industry and several others, as well.
>
>According to Forrester, 58% of online customers
>indicate fast performance as a key factor determining
>whether they'll return to a web site.
>
>Scoff, laugh, tell us we know nothing of Flash, tell us how much better
>you are than Gabo, etc.
>
>The list isn't here to "rank" the users. We're here to assist each
>other as best we can, and in many cases, we do so incorrectly, but I
>assure you that someone learns something from virtually every post here,
>even some of the OT ones. Please don't further disrespect the list;
>there's more friendships and networking occurring here than a lot of our
>newest members to the list may know of. Flash isn't our end of the
>universe.
>
>None of that matters; you cannot really effectively gage that; you can
>only show how lacking your professionalism is by attacking comments that
>
>are negative to you.
>
>My friend, step out of your own shadow and understand that most, if not
>all designs get bonged on the first attempt; regardless of how solid it
>is and how much validation you can give to yourself about. I can
>already smell how you want to start a flame on this, and I simply will
>not participate any further than I have on this list.
>
>Good luck to you.
>
>Russell Unger
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
>email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
>N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
>For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
>email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
>N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
>For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]