[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: Free vs paid for ISPs
From: Stefan Magdalinski
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 14:46:28 +0100

Ray Taylor wrote:
>
> From: Steve Bowbrick <steveatwebmedia [dot] com>
>
> >This is silly. It's a matter of habit. We're accustomed to paying for
> >access so it will take a while for free to become the norm. However, once
> >it does, captains of industry will be lining up alongside yoof and grannies
> >for the free stuff (which, as I keep saying, isn't actually free anyway -
> >just metered differently)
>
> Why should free become the norm? Will big companies get free access to the
> net for all their employees or will it just be home access? Will home/office
> users want free access or fast access? Walking is free, but most people
> travel by public transport (expensive) or car if they can (even more
> expensive) so why presume the only benefit consumers are looking for is low
> price or no price?

You answered your own question.

home access=56K=slow but cheap
corporate access=~T1= fast but expensive.

so simple, a child could understand it.

--
/**
Stefan Magdalinski m 0370 67 70 58
stefanatisness [dot] org h 0171 580 0831
it's isness as usual... **/



Replies
  Re: UKNM: Free vs paid for ISPs, Ray Taylor

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]