RE: FLASH: Simple Javascript for IE 3.02 or lower?

[Jean Dukate]

Well I tried to find this information on the net with no luck. But I

thought Netscape 2.0 didn't have support for Javascript. Also I believe

they didn't have support for frames in 2.0 either. If these two

assumptions are correct. Then you could possibly set up your initial

page with a 100% frame and 0 height frame that will be used as a

makeshift way of detecting Netscape 2.0 users and with the <noframe> tag

generate an html page specifically designed for 2.0 users. All browser

version above 2.0 shouldn't get the html designed for 2.0 due to the

frame support in those respective browsers.


Once again this is based on assumptions of what is not available in

version 2.0. I tried to find this info but was not successful so if

anyone knows for sure please post. Otherwsie the above described

technique should work. 




> ----------

>

From: Sidney Maestre[SMTP:sid156 [dot] com]

>

Reply To: flashershocker [dot] com

> Sent: 	Monday, August 24, 1998 12:32 AM

>

To: flashershocker [dot] com

> Subject: 	Re: FLASH: Simple Javascript for IE 3.02 or lower?

> 

> I make the netscape 2.0 comment in reference to the Javascript which

> may be used

> out side of the "plug-in world".

> 

> I'm always looking for javascript that is as back ward compatible as

> possible.

> 

> BTW- If you do any work for the education market, they are still

> heavily mac

> centric and I know Netscape 2.0 is the browser of choice among slower

> mac's.

> Was your "bonehead" comment directed at the teaching establishment?

> ;-)  Better

> not get you started on that one.

> 

> -Sid

> 

> David Gary wrote:

> 

> > Sidney Maestre wrote:

> >

> > > Hi Dave,

> > >

> > > Yep, it works with Netscape 3.0 and IE 3.01 and 4.0 on the Mac.

> > >

> > > What's suppose to happen with Netscape 2.0?  All I got was a blank

> window.

> > > It didn't load

> > > main.htm?

> > >

> > > -Sid

> > >

> >

> > NS 2.0?!! Huh?

> >

> > Sorry my Flash work isnt geared toward boneheads still using 2.0

> > Im a bonehead for still using 3.0!<g>

> >

> > Its bad enough developing for I.E. 3.0. It sucks.

> > 2.0 browsers are just a little to "Neanderthal" for cutting edge.

> > =8>)-

> >

> > Is anyone still developing Flash for NS2.0?

> >

> > -DG-

> >

> >

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

> --

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an

>

> email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com

> > N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to

> subscribe.

> > For info on digest mode send: info flasher to

>

list-managershocker [dot] com

> 

> 

> 

> 

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

> --

> To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an

>

email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com

> N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.

>

For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com

> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------

To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an

email to

list-managershocker [dot] com

.  Problems to:

ownershocker [dot] com

N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.

For info on digest mode send: info flasher to

list-managershocker [dot] com