Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: FLASH: OT: Fireworks replacing Adobe Photoshop?
From: Colleen Appleton
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 18:50:20 +0100

I can't do without my Photoshop so boycotting adobe won't work for me. If
MM takes that cute little hand from PS that is used to smear the colours
together, and if they add diffuse and other neat tricks, and if they add all
the fancy stuff to Fireworks that PS has, then I wouldn't need PS anymore.

Fireworks doesn't do everything PS does and PS doesn't do everything FW does
so I need them both. FW is to limiting for special effects when it comes to
all the neat plug-ins PS has.

And if you add the plug-ins to FW, you are still relying on Adobe so it's a
no win situation for the artists here.

Can't we play nice MM and Adobe? You're hurting us.... your customers.




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Full flasher archive now available online at:
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/archive.shtml
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpatchinwag [dot] com


Replies
  Re: FLASH: OT: Fireworks replacing Adobe, Matt Spiegler
  Re: FLASH: OT: Fireworks replacing Adobe, Laura Mollett

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]