Re: FLASH: OT/courtesy

[Bob Schwartz]

I appreciate the note.........and don't think just one was what the writer was

referring to.


I *am* asking a lot of questions and while I think that many may benefit from

the answers (flash is fairly new and other ignorant people are bound to be

showing up here), that meant a handful of "thanks".


candidly, I think even a private note to me about it is, well, not even worth

the bandwidth vs. just deleting such messages, but since the writer was

explicit in his dislike of it and i don't want to be a negative here, I thought

I'd ask.


cheers to you to<g>.


bob


At 04:54 PM 2/10/99 -0400, you wrote:

>I do not think that your thank you message was out of place.  When you

>consider how many messages go through here in the run of a day, it is absurd

>to say that one small message clutters a list.

>

>Cheers,

>

>Bob

>

>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an

>

email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com

>N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.

>

For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com

>



------------------------------------------------------------------------

To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an

email to

list-managershocker [dot] com

.  Problems to:

ownershocker [dot] com

N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.

For info on digest mode send: info flasher to

list-managershocker [dot] com