Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: FLASH: symbols: movie clip vs. graphic |
From: | John Dowdell |
Date: | Fri, 27 Oct 2000 23:00:54 +0100 |
At 2:26 PM 10/27/0, Kurt Dommermuth wrote:
> I'm wondering if there is any disadvantage to just making
> everything an MC even if there is no animation going on inside.
Movie clips are "smart", and can talk with other objects. It's a little bit
cheaper to use a graphic symbol if it just sits there like a log... if you
don't need a movie clip's abilities then might as well use a graphic
symbol, although the differences usually wouldn't be perceptible.
jd
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and the Flash(tm) Film Festival
November 27-29, 2000, LONDON, National Film Theatre
Produced by United Digital Artists and lynda.com
-Sponsored by Macromedia, Adobe Systems and Apple Computer
-http://www.flashforward2000.com or UK tel. +44 (0870) 751 1526
Register before November 10 and save £200
http:// www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
Re: FLASH: symbols: movie clip vs. graph, Kristopher Schultz
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]