[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: UKNM: Re: Stats packages
From: Tim Ireland
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 09:50:07 +0100

Paula Dauncey asked:
> I'm currently assessing Webtrends and Hitlist for a client who wants to
> analyse their logfiles themselves, having only ever used Webtrends the
> advice I can give is limited. Does anyone have any strong views on which
> package is better? I know that neither is the correct answer but we've
> already explained the pitfalls to the client and they still want to go
> ahead!
>
> Many thanks
> Paula Dauncey
>
> Imaginet Limited

HitList is better IMO in that it can do as much or as little as you want
(i.e. full tech stats or the 'See Spot Run' version).

Excellent value for money and equally useful to you and the client.

You may also want to investigate TopDog for separate search engine ranking
stats. It's also a good submission tool. Free demo at:
http://www.topdog2000.com/topdog/freetrial.html

Cheers

Tim Ireland
www.designercity.com
www.another.com
www.buymybook.co.uk




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ScreamingMedia the leading global technology platform for
the aggregation and distribution of digital content over the
Internet, is now operating in the United Kingdom.
Get relevant and customised content to attract visitors
to your site and keep them there. Click Here!

http://adcenter.in2.com/cgi-bin/click.cgi?tid=31036
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  RE: UKNM: Re: Stats packages, Tim Gibbon

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]