[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: RE: UKNM: The Disposable Brand
From: Carol Dukes
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1998 16:05:54 +0100

This is really interesting Bill. Two thoughts:

- are we sure that Hollywood really likes the "disposable brand model"?
Would the plethora of sequel movies not suggest that studios are trying
to turn their successes from one-hit wonders into reliable repeaters?

- the movie industry is largely based on people paying for the content,
which is not yet the way of the Web. It seems likely that advertising
will play some part in most Internet business models. A one-shot
disposable brand is difficult to sell to advertisers as it is hard to be
confident in advance about the scale or nature of the audience, whereas
the repeat brand model of, say, a magazine enables everyone to know the
likely environment and audience for advertising prior to publication of
each issue.

However a repeat brand is not necessarily the same as a brand extension,
which is presumably what the iVillage / Hearst rumours are about.

Carol Dukes
Managing Director
Carlton Online Ltd
25 Knightsbridge, London SW1X 7RZ
Tel: +44 171 663 6434
Email: cdukesatcarltononline [dot] com
Web: http://www.carltononline.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Thompson [billatdial [dot] pipex [dot] com (mailto:billatdial [dot] pipex [dot] com)]
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 1998 6:54 PM
To: uk-netmarketingatchinwag [dot] com
Subject: UKNM: The Disposable Brand


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I don't know if you get @NY (see www.atnewyork.com for all the details)
but editor Jason Chervokas has a piece in the current issue about
how Hollywood is taking over content online. And he says

(START QUOTE)
New York's mediacentric way of thinking is brand-obsessed. Build a
brand, hold it close, and extend its offerings is the thinking at places
like iVillage, for example. It's no wonder then that iVillage is rumored
to
be in talks with magazine publisher Hearst. Like Hearst iVillage is
trying
to build a brand that will live for years and accrue money, audience,
and
cultural association the way old-line magazines always have. But in
Hollywood, each film is like a disposable brand that lives several
lives--theatrical, foreign, home video, interactive--but ultimately
comes
and goes. Hollywood is used to spending hundreds of millions of dollars
on
disposable content brands. Ultimately, the disposable content-brand
model
may be the one that makes the most sense for the Internet, at least
until
the platform is more stable and access is ubiquitous.
(END QUOTE)


It seems to me that he has hit upon something really important - and
until we can work with this model we'll never make online as
important as other media.

Bill

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.5.3i for non-commercial use <http://www.pgpi.com>

iQA/AwUBNew0oFNT/DkNet0bEQKKQgCfbDIlWT7ZaspIEQlObzSuD2+Vm9UAn3f7
wTF68CoKjxr354jLiOxyKeub
=BcJ5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bill Thompson +44 (0) 1223 245963
mobile: 0411 557361 http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/bill/
"You'll have to pry my private key out of my cold dead hands."
"Your proposal is acceptable..."
<<PGP Fingerprint>>
7C57 5EE5 0D5C C365 7E33 22E6 5353 FC39 0D7A DD1B



Replies
  RE: UKNM: The Disposable Brand, Darren Wallace
  RE: UKNM: The Disposable Brand, Steve Bowbrick

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]