Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH: Publish 3 and 4
From: Nigel Randsley-Pena
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 23:55:24 +0100

Warren,

I know some of the concerns expressed are important. And so does
Macromedia. So much so that we will be seeing a new player very soon as
a result of a phase 1 correction.
It is my understanding that each and every one of the relevant concerns
was placed on a priority by Macromedia and that the most serious ones
will be addressed in this phase while other not so 'impactfull' concerns
will be addressed during phase 2.
So this should have been a closed case right ?
Wrong ! Far form it. Macromedia bashing is trendy so let's keep it up.
The discussion has reached a level that prompts this kind of reply from
you about new concerns :
"You will NOT be able to turn off the remote if someone has linked to
your site -- and already has the remote on. That will not change and
only assholes want it to change. (I said this was brief.)"

My post, that you quoted, was quite bland, and I held back some more
acrid remarks just because of the original posters. Just try to keep
thhis up and I will have more to say.

Nigel

------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com


Replies
  Re: FLASH: Publish 3 and 4, Warren 'The Howdy Man' Oc

Replies
  FLASH: Publish 3 and 4, KJ
  Re: FLASH: Publish 3 and 4, Nigel Randsley-Pena
  Re: FLASH: Publish 3 and 4, Warren 'The Howdy Man' Oc

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]