Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: Flash text was (Re: FLASH: images quality) |
From: | Lena Björklund |
Date: | Thu, 26 Aug 1999 21:51:23 +0100 |
Hi John.
John Croteau wrote:
> Hi Lena,
>
> I do appreciate your calling my explination a mess...
I meant "mess" as short for "message". 8)
John Croteau wrote:
> Hi Lena,
>
> > To my understanding, the "imaginary" freedom of font choice and typesetting
> > in Flash, isn´t solved, then. Is that right a right interpretetion of your
> > mess?
> I do appreciate your calling my explination a mess...
> Most people increse the minimum font size they use
> by a point or two to compensate for Flash's smoothness.
Me to. But I very much miss the opportunity to set texts in 12-13 or smaller
points for "regular text" (it´s "bread text" in swedish). You always have to
test wether the font you like to use works - is readable - or not. In most cases
it isn´t.
Lena B
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
Re: Flash text was (Re: FLASH: images qu, John Croteau
Replies
FLASH: images quality, marco berti
Re: FLASH: images quality, John Croteau
Re: FLASH: images quality, Lena Björklund
Flash text was (Re: FLASH: images qualit, John Croteau
Re: Flash text was (Re: FLASH: images qu, Lena Björklund
Re: Flash text was (Re: FLASH: images qu, John Croteau
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]