Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH:SITE CHECK -for Ken and Pascal
From: Tom Green
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:14:28 GMT



brzys wrote:

> Ahem, Tom Green,
>
> A good website should contain good technique as well as content. A good
> marriage of the two! Sometimes you get one or the other; it's a difficult
> challenge to accomplish both tasks, especially if you're "more creative" in
> just one of the two.
> <snip>

> Uh, Mary, isn't that sorta what I was getting at when I wrote :

> "Balancing technique with content is an art and you would do well to study
> how such sites as etalent .com or even hillmancurtis achieve that balance
> with great success."

What hacks me off are the sites that are all technique with no design. They are
nothing morte than interactive "ransom notes" :).They answer the age-old
question: How much stuff that I just learned on the Flash list can I jam into a
browser window?


flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and The Flash Film Festival
"The Worlds Premier Flash Solutions Conference and Expo"
March 27-29, Nob Hill Masonic Center, San Francisco, California

-Register before Feb 25 and save $200!!-- www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpatchinwag [dot] com


Replies
  RE: FLASH: SITE CHECK please, Stefaniw, Ted
  Re: FLASH: SITE CHECK please-Thanx, Pascal Brun
  MOVIE SIZE CONSIDERATIONS for Pascal and, unique
  Re: FLASH:SITE CHECK -for Ken and Pascal, Tom Green
  Re: FLASH:SITE CHECK -for Ken and Pascal, Darren Critchley
  Re: FLASH:SITE CHECK -for Ken and Pascal, brzys

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]