Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: FLASH:SITE CHECK -for Ken and Pascal |
From: | Tom Green |
Date: | Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:14:28 GMT |
brzys wrote:
> Ahem, Tom Green,
>
> A good website should contain good technique as well as content. A good
> marriage of the two! Sometimes you get one or the other; it's a difficult
> challenge to accomplish both tasks, especially if you're "more creative" in
> just one of the two.
> <snip>
> Uh, Mary, isn't that sorta what I was getting at when I wrote :
> "Balancing technique with content is an art and you would do well to study
> how such sites as etalent .com or even hillmancurtis achieve that balance
> with great success."
What hacks me off are the sites that are all technique with no design. They are
nothing morte than interactive "ransom notes" :).They answer the age-old
question: How much stuff that I just learned on the Flash list can I jam into a
browser window?
flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and The Flash Film Festival
"The World’s Premier Flash Solutions Conference and Expo"
March 27-29, Nob Hill Masonic Center, San Francisco, California
-Register before Feb 25 and save $200!!-- www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
RE: FLASH: SITE CHECK please, Stefaniw, Ted
Re: FLASH: SITE CHECK please-Thanx, Pascal Brun
MOVIE SIZE CONSIDERATIONS for Pascal and, unique
Re: FLASH:SITE CHECK -for Ken and Pascal, Tom Green
Re: FLASH:SITE CHECK -for Ken and Pascal, Darren Critchley
Re: FLASH:SITE CHECK -for Ken and Pascal, brzys
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]