Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | RE: FLASH: OT: photographing TV set for web/Flash use |
From: | Brack, Jeremy |
Date: | Wed, 8 Nov 2000 11:48:07 GMT |
Thanks Tom!
I will let you know if the photos turn out good.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Kerwin [tomkoxbridgelife [dot] com (mailto:tomkoxbridgelife [dot] com)]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 6:16 AM
To: 'flasherchinwag [dot] com'
Subject: RE: FLASH: OT: photographing TV set for web/Flash use
Each frame is indeed made of two interlaced fields, and they're both
displayed at the same time. A shutter speed of 60 will therefore show half
the scan lines, all in a block.
If the moment you're photographing doesn't involve much movement then there
won't be much difference between the two interlaced fields. In that case, I
think the shutter speed of 30 should get a decent image.
I've never actually photographed tv myself, but understand the above after
doing some video capture with some very odd proprietary software.
Good luck,
Tom
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and the Flash(tm) Film Festival
November 27-29, 2000, LONDON, National Film Theatre
Produced by United Digital Artists and lynda.com
-Sponsored by Macromedia, Adobe Systems and Apple Computer
-http://www.flashforward2000.com or UK tel. +44 (0870) 751 1526
Register before November 10 and save £200
http:// www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpchinwag [dot] com
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]