[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: Site Inspection
From: Ian Fenn (Chopstix)
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 11:16:00 GMT

At 04:26 PM 3/14/00 +0000, Ray wrote:
>Personally, I can think of few things more tedious and absurd than reading
>about a web site in a print magazine. Have never done it, and don't intend
>to start now. Unless other readers find it useful, I would be happy if NMA
>dropped site inspection as something a bit out of date.

I disagree. It's interesting and useful to read someone else's take on a
web site, regardless of whether you've seen the site or not. It stops us
from getting big-headed and thinking that we know everything... :-)

>If you think about it, the reason fast cars, yachts, etc, are reviewed in
>magazines is that it provides vicarious access to something most people
>can't afford. So what value do web site reviews bring when all you have to
>do is type in www.yetanotherpoxywebsite.com to find out for yourself?

Another person's view.

>You could save a lot of time and just ask site owners to submit their
launch
>details and print that.

Probably a place for that too.

All the best,

--
Ian Fenn
http://www.chopstix.net/


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
post new media vacancies for free uknm-jobsatchinwag [dot] com
*******************
sponsor the uk-netmarketing list and website, contact
salesatchinwag [dot] com for more details.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  RE: UKNM: Site Inspection, Bunder, Leslie
  Re: UKNM: Site Inspection, Ray Taylor

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]