Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | New thought (was) Re: FLASH: OT: PNG instead of GIF/JPEGs |
From: | Colleen Appleton |
Date: | Tue, 7 Nov 2000 13:43:08 GMT |
I'm not sure I'm understanding "the rest of world" when it comes to web
design and using Flash. When radio and print was the only means of
communication, and the television came out, not everyone could afford to
switch. But now it's no longer an issue. If they want to keep their black
and white television and never make it to Oz where there's colour then it's
their choice, but you don't see "them" hounding Circuit City to only stock
B&W TV's. So why are WE being hounded to make multiple sites to please
everyone or to eliminate Flash? TV made drastic changes for the better,
just like the web has been doing. What really get's to me the most is
that browsers are free so why don't people just upgrade? Are there that
many computers out there that can't handle a better browser?
I'm making a web portal site which uses Flash, UltraDev and other MM
software. Disney did it. Is it so wrong to not want to cater to people who
don't upgrade? Is it so wrong to say we are multimedia companies and if you
don't like multimedia, then our sites are not for you?
I get mean letters from people who hate Flash. They want me to take it off
my sites. I would like to say "I bet you still have a black and white TV
don't you?" but I bite my tongue.
How much longer before we decide "we are there" and can forget the ones who
don't upgrade? Or do you think this is an ongoing issue for as long as the
web exists?
Colleen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
version 4+ browser can show png which unfortunately isn't supported by other
version browsers. So basically its a backwards compatability issue...if
your site uses features not supported by below version 4 browsers, most
clients still prefer the site to be visible, if not completely perfect. With
png's unfortunately the site would just show up a whole load of broken image
links... which is not very usefull.
in time version 4 browsers will attain a critical mass and then png's will
become perfectly acceptable.... personally i don't quite think we are there
just yet.
stephan
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flashforward2000 and the Flash(tm) Film Festival
November 27-29, 2000, LONDON, National Film Theatre
Produced by United Digital Artists and lynda.com
-Sponsored by Macromedia, Adobe Systems and Apple Computer
-http://www.flashforward2000.com or UK tel. +44 (0870) 751 1526
Register before November 10 and save £200
http:// www.flashforward2000.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
Re: New thought (was) Re: FLASH: OT: PNG, Max Johnson
Re: New thought (was) Re: FLASH: OT: PNG, kristoff
RE: New thought (was) Re: FLASH: OT: PNG, JGL
Replies
FLASH: OT: PNG instead of GIF/JPEGs, Thorvald Neumann
Re: FLASH: OT: PNG instead of GIF/JPEGs, Gabriel Mulzer
Re: FLASH: OT: PNG instead of GIF/JPEGs, David Gee
Re: FLASH: OT: PNG instead of GIF/JPEGs, stephan seifert
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]